Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conference Series Events with over 1000+ Conferences, 1000+ Symposiums
and 1000+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business.

Explore and learn more about Conference Series : World's leading Event Organizer

Back

Shaghayegh Rahmani

Islamic Azad University, Iran

Title: The emergency department trigger tool implementation

Biography

Biography: Shaghayegh Rahmani

Abstract

Introduction: Trigger Tool (TT) was first designed by the Institute for Health Improvement. In 2009, a revised version of TT was developed for the emergency, surgery, pediatric and intensive care units. In this paper we share the executive experience of using Emergency Department Trigger Tool (EDTT) in our academic emergency department.

Method: This is a retrospective observational study using data from one month of visits to an academic, tertiary emergency department by patients aged ≥18 years (5600 records). We randomly based on random block method evaluated 100 records with at least 6 hours of hospital stay. In this study two review teams evaluated medical records. Each team consists of an experienced emergency medicine specialist and one Registered Nurse (RN) with great experience within emergency department care. Records not containing any triggers or containing only false positive triggers, i.e. triggers not indicating AEs were not forwarded to physicians for review but the outcome was documented and included in the analysis. The RNs also recorded demographics data, and entered all patients into the database. No time restriction existed in this review stage. A similar three-point Likert scale was used to investigate the preventability of the Adverse Events (AEs).

Results: In this study records of 100 patients were reviewed in a two stage review process. 39 patients (39%) were female and 61 ones (61%) were male. The difference in finding triggers was estimated about 5%. And overall Inter-Observer Agreement (IOA) was 0.828. From 100 evaluated cases, 82 files had triggers and 18 had not. Mean age of our patients was 62.1 ± 7.2 years. 142 triggers were identified in 82 files. Patients mean age was 62 ± 7.2 years. 19 medical records (23.1%) contained more than one trigger.

Conclusion: Using EDTT help health care providers to perform an accurate and comprehensive review to evaluate quality of care.

Keywords: Trigger tool, Emergency department, adverse event.